Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
Comparing our thriller opening to the preliminary task it is clear to say that the planning stage has dramatically improved and much greater consideration has been taken into account when considering cast, setting and costume to name a few. Overall, we have put much greater focus on the aspects of film such as; mise-en-scene; camera angles, shots and movement; sounds; and editing. It can also be said that if the pre-production and planning stages had been considered greater for the preliminary task, the overall media product would have been significantly greater.
For example, in terms of match-on-action and continuity editing, I have dramatically improved and the 180-degree rule has been applied well in our thriller opening:
Continuity and match on action in my preliminary task:
make animated gifs like this at MakeAGif
Continuity and match on action in our thriller opening:
make animated gifs like this at MakeAGif
Overall, the editing in our thriller is significantly smoother and the match-on-action and continuity principles have been applied more successfully than in my preliminary task.
What's more, following the preliminary task I learnt about the rule of thirds and technical use of three-point lighting. This is another great improvement because the lighting for the preliminary task was a weakness whereas now it has become a strength in establish setting, atmosphere and characters and three-point lighting is a concept that has fully been utilised in our thriller opening. This can be seen in the flashback scenes where key-light was used to create effect and establish character and setting. In contrast, three-point lighting was a concept that remained unused in my preliminary task and thus made the product appear unprofessional and dimly lit. Had I known about technical areas of lighting at the time, my preliminary task would be significantly better.
Moreover, the variety of camera shots and angles has changed and been utilised successfully, where low-angle shots and high-angle shots were used to connote power and authority over other characters in our thriller opening. Also, the composition of the shots where the rule of thirds can be applied has been developed. Rather than following the rule in every shot, the rule has been specifically broken for effect. For example in the second shot below, the antagonist is central to the shot and his eyes do not touch any of the cross sections whereas in the first shot the protagonist lies on the right had vertical third and her head and body are at the bottom and top cross sections for this third. However, the rule of thirds in my preliminary task was conformed to throughout rather than developed and this has a less dramatic effect on the audience and has monotonous feel to it.
![]() |
High low-angle shot of the protagonist |
![]() |
Low high-angle shot of the antagonist |